To tax or not to tax - this question could have never been asked twenty years ago. Historically, income tax is a novel invention. Still, it became so widespread and so socially accepted that no one dared challenge it seriously. In the lunatic fringes there were those who refused to pay taxes and served prison sentences as a result. Some of them tried to translate their platforms into political power and established parties, which failed dismally in the polls. But some of what they said made sense.
The integration of UTPs under FIN 48 applies to all of the schedules required to be disclosed in the tax footnote. For example, an increase in a UTP that has a significant impact on the tax rate might have to be separately disclosed in the effective tax rate reconciliation. Likewise, the breakdown of the tax provision into federal, state, and foreign components need to reflect UTPs in each of those jurisdictions. If there are UTPs set up for temporary differences, this could impact the presentation of deferred tax balances. Under FIN 48, UTPs formerly computed under FAS 5 must now be re-viewed using new standards for identification, probability, computation, and disclosure.
Taxes are inherently unjust. They are enforced, using state coercion. They are an infringement of the human age old right to property. Money is transferred from one group of citizens (law abiding taxpayers) - to other groups. The recipients are less savoury: they either do not pay taxes legally (low income populations, children, the elderly) - or avoid paying taxes illegally. But there is no way of preventing a tax evader from enjoying tax money paid by others.
Recently, however, some have begun to explore in more detail the theoretical framework linking VAT, tariff reform, trade and welfare, turning up some interesting and to some extent disquieting results. Analysts have also recently begun to discuss the implications for VAT of the considerably larger underground or shadow economies found in Albania as compared to developed countries. Some analysis suggests that in the presence of a substantial 'informal' sector, a tax like VAT that falls on the formal sector acts to deter the growth and development of the economy as a whole. Increasing consumption taxes definitely fosters the expansion of the hidden economy if the labor-intensity of production in that sector is greater than in the formal sector. The present government need for revenues suggest that even government aware of such problems may have nonetheless choose to impose higher taxes, including VAT, on the formal sector of the economy because with their relatively weak tax administrations the best way for them to raise revenue may be to increase barriers to entry to the formal sector, thus creating 'rents' that may then be taxed.
The results were socially and morally devastating: an avalanche of illegal activities, all intended to avoid paying taxes. Monstrous black economies were formed by entrepreneuring souls. These economic activities went unreported and totally deformed the processes of macroeconomic decision making, supposedly based on complete economic data. This apparent lack of macroeconomic control creates a second layer of mistrust between the citizen and his government (on top of the one related to the collection of taxes).
Changes in tax rates can also have a significant impact on the integration of UTPs into the tax provision. UTPs will normally be recorded at the tax rates used to file the tax return for the year in which the issue arose. For example, a potential disallowance of an expense in a prior year must be measured at the tax rates in effect for that year. This could be different from the tax rates used to compute the tax provision in the current year. This means that UTPs must be tax effected and carried forward using a unique rate structure that is not dependent upon the rates used in the tax provision for the current year. As noted above, the UTPs must be integrated into all aspects of the tax footnote disclosure. The different tax rate structures make it difficult to simply add UTPs and tax return activity together on a pretax basis. Instead, it may be advisable to tax effect the UTPs separately and then add them to the standard tax provision computations. Under FAS 109, de-ferret tax assets and liabilities arising from the return are adjusted for future tax rate changes, normally with an offset to the deferred tax provision.
The integration of UTPs under FIN 48 applies to all of the schedules required to be disclosed in the tax footnote. For example, an increase in a UTP that has a significant impact on the tax rate might have to be separately disclosed in the effective tax rate reconciliation. Likewise, the breakdown of the tax provision into federal, state, and foreign components need to reflect UTPs in each of those jurisdictions. If there are UTPs set up for temporary differences, this could impact the presentation of deferred tax balances. Under FIN 48, UTPs formerly computed under FAS 5 must now be re-viewed using new standards for identification, probability, computation, and disclosure.
Taxes are inherently unjust. They are enforced, using state coercion. They are an infringement of the human age old right to property. Money is transferred from one group of citizens (law abiding taxpayers) - to other groups. The recipients are less savoury: they either do not pay taxes legally (low income populations, children, the elderly) - or avoid paying taxes illegally. But there is no way of preventing a tax evader from enjoying tax money paid by others.
Recently, however, some have begun to explore in more detail the theoretical framework linking VAT, tariff reform, trade and welfare, turning up some interesting and to some extent disquieting results. Analysts have also recently begun to discuss the implications for VAT of the considerably larger underground or shadow economies found in Albania as compared to developed countries. Some analysis suggests that in the presence of a substantial 'informal' sector, a tax like VAT that falls on the formal sector acts to deter the growth and development of the economy as a whole. Increasing consumption taxes definitely fosters the expansion of the hidden economy if the labor-intensity of production in that sector is greater than in the formal sector. The present government need for revenues suggest that even government aware of such problems may have nonetheless choose to impose higher taxes, including VAT, on the formal sector of the economy because with their relatively weak tax administrations the best way for them to raise revenue may be to increase barriers to entry to the formal sector, thus creating 'rents' that may then be taxed.
The results were socially and morally devastating: an avalanche of illegal activities, all intended to avoid paying taxes. Monstrous black economies were formed by entrepreneuring souls. These economic activities went unreported and totally deformed the processes of macroeconomic decision making, supposedly based on complete economic data. This apparent lack of macroeconomic control creates a second layer of mistrust between the citizen and his government (on top of the one related to the collection of taxes).
Changes in tax rates can also have a significant impact on the integration of UTPs into the tax provision. UTPs will normally be recorded at the tax rates used to file the tax return for the year in which the issue arose. For example, a potential disallowance of an expense in a prior year must be measured at the tax rates in effect for that year. This could be different from the tax rates used to compute the tax provision in the current year. This means that UTPs must be tax effected and carried forward using a unique rate structure that is not dependent upon the rates used in the tax provision for the current year. As noted above, the UTPs must be integrated into all aspects of the tax footnote disclosure. The different tax rate structures make it difficult to simply add UTPs and tax return activity together on a pretax basis. Instead, it may be advisable to tax effect the UTPs separately and then add them to the standard tax provision computations. Under FAS 109, de-ferret tax assets and liabilities arising from the return are adjusted for future tax rate changes, normally with an offset to the deferred tax provision.
About the Author:
Frank Miller has a Debt Consolidation Blog & Finance, these are some of the articles: Basic Information Relating To How Each Investor May Value An Ounce Of Gold You have full permission to reprint this article provided this box is kept unchanged.
No comments:
Post a Comment